Talk:Stronghold 3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stronghold 3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Stronghold 3" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (3 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Release date

Hey I edited the release date to 25 October and added (amazon) at the end as Wikipedia considers references to amazon spam (the date was on amazon before the reference site said it got the date from amazon but I found it one week later) Madooo12 (talk) 16:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Characters

For you who didn't get the story video, the main enemy is the Wolf (SH1 & SHC). 207.144.59.103 (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly Biased

Man, that article is insanely biased. It needs a complete re-write. 24.224.214.171 (talk) 05:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous

This article needs to be completely rewritten by someone who is not completely biased.

"Despite the addition of a day and night cyles and improved (albeit sub par graphics for a game of 2011) graphics half the features of the previous games are non existent. One must question as to whether Firefly accidentally released an alpha version of the game considering the almost unbelievable lack of content. Four multiplayer maps, lacking campaign, game breaking bugs, no skirmish AI, and maddeningly small maps. Furthermore the new physics engine is ridiculously over done as every unit atop a wall will fly away when hit. Therefore actually putting units atop walls is counter productive, It looks rather stupid as men fly all over the screen."

This needs completely removed. I would but I'm not sure I have the skill to do so gracefully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djpenman (talk • contribs) 13:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all ridiculous

The game really is like that, i just played it. Ofcourse he elaborated a bit too much, but to get a good grasp of the situation of Stronghold 3 please read this review: http://theunplayables.com/2011/10/i-quit-stronghold-3/

Also i'm sorry if this comment looks odd, i seldomly add something to Wikipedia, i was just very irritated that there was no reference to the brokenness in which this game was released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlfbck (talk • contribs) 16:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

extensive patching!?

Please remove the line near the end stating the game has undergone extensive patching, as of 4/11/2011 only 2 small patches have been released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.218.31 (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Since when are almost universally negative reviews mixed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.138.13.2 (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Metacritic lists 14 'mixed' and 12 'negative'. Seems 'mixed to negative' to me. Got some WP:RS to back up your claim otherwise? -Oosh (talk) 10:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still extant?

I've heard Southpeak has gone under - and their website seems to have disappeared too. Can anyone confirm this? Grill (talk) 01:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]